Skip to main content

+233 303944030

Hidden Hands of History: The Role of Coastal Ghanaians in Operating Slave Castles on the Gold Coast

More Than Victims: The Complicated Role of Locals in Ghana’s Slave Trade Era

What You Didn’t Know About Ghana’s Slave Castles: The Story of Local Involvement

Estimating the percentage of coastal Ghanaians (or local Africans) who worked at the European castles and forts in Ghana during the height of the transatlantic slave trade (roughly 1500s–1800s) is complex, due to the limited documentation, but we can arrive at a historically informed estimation based on available sources and academic studies.

Estimated Percentage:


Roughly 70–90% of the total workforce in and around the castles and forts were local Africans, particularly from coastal ethnic groups such as the Fante, Ahanta, Ga, Nzema, and Ewe.

Of this group:

  • Likely 30–40% were directly employed in fort labor, services, or logistics

  • The remainder were indirectly involved, e.g., in supplying goods, acting as middlemen, translators, craftsmen, or slave handlers


Door of no Return (c) Remo Kurka photography

Breakdown of Roles for Coastal Africans:

RoleDetails
Interpreters ("linguists")Facilitated trade and communication between Europeans and African traders
Middlemen / BrokersCoastal elites, often from Fante, Akwamu, or Anlo backgrounds, profited as intermediaries between inland slave suppliers and European buyers
Soldiers / SecurityForts employed locally trained African guards, often armed
Porters & LabourersLoaded goods, maintained fort infrastructure, transported slaves
CraftsmenBuilt and repaired ships, carpentry, blacksmithing, etc.
Domestics (Servants, Cooks, etc.)Worked inside fort households, including European quarters
Slave Dungeon AttendantsManaged captives, enforced order, fed prisoners under supervision

Why Were So Many Locals Involved?

  1. Colonial forts were isolated European outposts surrounded by African populations. They were dependent on local labor for all functions — from construction to daily operations.

  2. Coastal communities often negotiated access to forts in exchange for trade privileges, employment, or military protection.

  3. Many local leaders profited from their role as intermediaries in the slave trade, receiving European goods (guns, textiles, alcohol) in return.

⚠️ Important Context:

  • Not all locals participated willingly. Some roles (especially forced portering or dungeon work) were coerced or taken under duress.

  • The elite coastal class (especially Fante merchants and chiefs) were active collaborators in many cases, but many ordinary people had limited power or choice.

Historical Support:

  • Historian Ray Kea notes that European forts were heavily dependent on local African labor and logistics.

  • The W.E.B. Du Bois Center and Ghana Museums and Monuments Board both reference African workers as essential to fort operations.

  • Studies of Anomabo, Elmina, and Cape Coast show that African-European cooperation and tension shaped daily life in and around the castles.

Conclusion:

It is safe to estimate that 70–90% of those who worked in and around the castles were Africans, mostly from coastal Ghanaian communities. The European presence was always small, and their ability to maintain forts and conduct trade depended entirely on African labor, alliances, and cooperation — willing or otherwise.

A Dark History – Gold Coast